Tags
Active imagination, Analytical Psychology, Anima and Animus, Carl Jung, differentiation, individuation, Jung, Liber Novus, Pleroma, psychological function, Septem Sermones ad Mortuos, The First Sermon to the Dead, The Red Book, Undiscovered Self
The Red Book is an account of Carl Jung’s journey in the abstract of his unconscious… handwritten by Carl Gustav Jung, this is the pinnacle for all of his works… the final proof really of Jung’s contributions to understanding the human psyche. The marketed book includes a reproduction of his handwritten manuscript (Swiss) as well as a translation by Sonu Shamdasani and including Jung’s abstract illustrations.
.
In 1957, Jung gave an interview to Aniela Jaffé about the Red Book and his process; saying:
The years… when I pursued the inner images, were the most important time of my life. Everything else is to be derived from this. It began at that time, and the later details hardly matter anymore. My entire life consisted in elaborating what had burst forth from the unconscious and flooded me like an enigmatic stream and threatened to break me. That was the stuff and material for more than only one life. Everything later was merely the outer classification, scientific elaboration, and the integration into life. But the numinous beginning, which contained everything, was then.
.
.
Program Description Professor Sonu Shamdasani introduces the creation and significance of Carl Jung’s Red Book. On view to the public for the first time, the book was the center piece of the exhibition The Red Book of C. G. Jung: Creation of a New Cosmology at The Rubin Museum of Art from October 7, 2009 – February 15, 2010.
SORRY: the source volume is low. This was the best video I could find for what I wanted to quickly demonstrate from Jung’s work.
.
The Undiscovered Self — Jung — Awakening If you are making a study of Jung’s works, begin instead of with this book with an overview of Jung’s Analytical Psychology, with his theory of archetypes, with self-reflection and with understanding of your own personality… the who are you approach works, in my opinion. Jung’s greatest contribution really is to the questions we all ask of ourselves… who am I? What are my motivations, communication style, and relationships preferences about? You are a lot more effective when you understand yourself as well as people that you must motivate or manage or develop and help or live with. Unless you are planning to spend years at studying Jung, the real importance of his work for you will be that he provides experiences that stimulate asking questions to connect with a higher-self. Use, for example, a personality sorter and begin to know who you are and how prefer to be… if continuing with Jung, read Jung’s earlier published works… it may take 10 or 20 years to evolve a comprehensive knowledge of his work… I’ve been at it for that much or more. Jung’s works came about over many years — his lifetime really.
There are many important aspects of personality. The personality is our way of communicating. As a beginning, you’d discover which psychic energy attitude type is your preference. Orientated by, and related to the object, what is your preference? Are you more Introverted or Extraverted?
An introvert attitude is an abstracting one, motivated from within. That is, energy is internally directed toward the inner self. The primary problem presented to the introvert attitude is how to be withdrawn from the object. The extrovert maintains a positive attitude energy being directed outward toward the outside world.
Strongly orientated extroverts or introverts experience things in quite different ways and this may sometime cause conflict or misunderstandings with others. Jung said that extraversion and introversion are not mutually exclusive and will be self-balancing or compensating through the conscious and unconscious. A strongly extraverted outward consciousness will possess a compensatory strong inward unconscious introvert; and vice-versa. Jung linked this compensatory effect for example to repression of natural tendencies and resulting unhappiness or illness.
Explore the duality of your psyche… set out knowing that you must face your unconscious and even your deepest fears. In the end, an awakening must confront the skeletons in your closet. Beginning with God… forge a path to knowing that the human psyche is “by nature religious.” If you are not open to and interested in spiritual development, Jung is most probably not for you. If you immature in spirit, perhaps Jung is also not for you. If you want to know about reality, about living fully a conscious life, then delve into Jung’s works after finding some spiritual maturity… and come finally about it then to study “The Red Book.” You’ll probably discover his images are interesting too.
.
.
Program Description In this seminar Murray Stein and Paul Brutsche, International School of Analytical Psychology, discuss some of the different images in Carl Jung’s Red Book.
.
.
The Red Book
Here is a brief description of the fantastic Jung that awaits you:
I categorize the work as
CONFRONTATION WITH THE UNCONSCIOUS… THE FINAL HUMAN FRONTIER
like a future sci-fi may capture, a Jung companion work;
a summary of the revelation of Carl Jung…
Septem Sermones ad Mortuos . The Seven Sermons to the Dead transcribed by Carl Gustav Jung, 1916 written by Basilides
Beginning by Pleroma (the totality of divine power) everywhere is completely and without bounds nor end. There is no-thing and yet this is source of all. We, as Creatura, not in the pleroma, but in self, have from source, the smallest point that is everything and yet nothing. This is knowledge. By our Christian view, knowledge is lost or befuddled by choices (good and evil) and we miss the mark (source) by this sin. The separation by sin causes us to forget source and original knowledge; forever concocting choices as though each moment is separate from timeless all.
From Jung’s work, we understand the Pleroma as a source which is endless and eternal that has no qualities because it has all qualities. Even in the smallest subatomic particle known to science, the Pleroma is present without any bounds, eternally and completely. Yet, the smallest to greatest material of the universe have no place in the Pleroma.
From Pleroma, mystically, there is Creatura (creatures). “We submerge into the Pleroma itself, and we cease to be created beings. This we become subject to dissolution and nothingness.”
Jung on Individuation:
We, also, are the total Pleroma; for figuratively the Pleroma is an exceedingly small, hypothetical, even non-existent point within us, and also it is the limitless firmament of the cosmos about us. When we strive for the good and the beautiful, we thereby forget about our essential being, which is differentiation, and we are victimized by the qualities of the Pleroma which are the pairs of opposites.
.
Individuation Individuality is the higher self. The Jungian process of getting there is individuation; the striving after the true being self. So, individuality is in an evolution. Individuality does not ever die nor dissolve unless under special circumstances, perhaps the individual may cease to be, by choice. Individuality remains eternally. Individuation is the process of coming to a psychological wholeness via self-discovery of opposites. Personality does not know why nor how, nor about an incarnated history… as with every birth memory of the past is gone… we come into the world, babes in the flesh, crying and needy. Yet, individuality has an overview of incarnations and of some knowledge of the meaning of everything. Upon an awakening, some people claim to have knowledge of past lives. I do not promote beliefs that these are actual lives of an individual. However, the reported experiences are much like this. I maintain openness to possibility of multiple incarnations. How this may work is beyond the scope of this post. However, we certainly do learn of our individuation via the generations of material that is available to us as much as by self-examination.
Incarnation In traditional Christianity, incarnation is a belief that Jesus, God the Son or the Logos (Word), “became flesh,” being conceived in the womb of the Virgin Mary, also known as the Theotokos (God-bearer). This is a process that is mysterious and mystical. My understanding of incarnation do not exclude possibility re-incarnations; although, I don’t presently see this as a single person re-incarnating as I more fully explore what is the human experience of incarnation histories. See also: here As for Jung’s work, individuation is a process; becoming aware of oneself—that is of the fundamental composition. Individuation is the way toward discovery of a truest self. Liber Novus (printed on the book cover — a subtitle) means in Latin “New Book” but for Jung it meant the new way. Jung certainly put it there to say, “This is the book of the new way.” I like to say, its “The New Way Book.” I’ve met and interacted with more than ten thousand people in my time here… I am writing about this one lifetime. I’ve come to know that we all make choices for reasons. Our choices stem from states of consciousness.
Choices
TWO STATES
…1. Nothing exists …2. Everything exists
It is logically impossible for the idea, God, to not exist, therefore, everything exists is “more” correct, as it may seem. We’d take into consideration potentials as well. Therefore, there is more to be than already is. This will always be the case, I’d say. So, neither state is of itself true, in my opinion. The idea, God, is ever expanding and yet, unchanging. Wait… then, can there be another course of thinking that is more accurate?
THREE STATES
…1. Nothing exists …2. Everything exists …3. Multiplicity is
While the idea, God, is an idea that is represented as a singular being (although not a being in the sense of what we’d normally propose as being), we may perceive God as three or more differentiated beings (the aspects of one). Christianity is what I know best… so, I’ll say from that experience that the idea, God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit is three ideas of the one God. We typically declare in Christian views that they are three beings in unity, as one God.
Anima and Animus In reality, every female and every male is a psychological amalgamation of feminine and masculine characteristics (see: contrasexual). Anima (feminine) plus Animus (masculine) contrasexuality derives from the ultimate triune… Eros (masculine–independent archetype: god of love) and Logos (feminine dependant archetype: the principle governing the cosmos) that forms a soul-image. In a simple statement, two bring about a third and the amalgamation of the two in each. It is simple, yet elegant too. Look at love verse hate, and then wonder, what is the third aspect of that duality (autonomy vs. unity)? Is it choices? Choices come about in the differentiated world of men and women. If analyzed to their core, each choice is a factor of two opposing views (or two plus two more, and perhaps another pair and so on).
Closing
.
Jung, Brief Biography (Amazon)
Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961) was a Swiss psychiatrist, an influential thinker and the founder of analytic psychology (also known as Jungian psychology). Jung’s radical approach to psychology has been influential in the field of depth psychology and in counter-cultural movements across the globe. Jung is considered as the first modern psychologist to state that the human psyche is “by nature religious” and to explore it in depth. His many major works include “Analytic Psychology: Its Theory and Practice,” “Man and His Symbols,” “Memories, Dreams, Reflections,” “The Collected Works of Carl G. Jung,” and “The Red Book.”
.
Jung, Beliefs (Youtube)
.
.
Program Description This is a clip from a British documentary, however the exact source is not identified.
. .
.
Program Description The World Within – C.G. Jung in His Own Words
A 1990 Documentary about Carl Gustav Jung that explains his standpoints mainly by using footage of him talking.
More Carl Jung videos (YouTube playlist)
.
I would love to know if Jung is of further interest to readers. Likes are wonderful, but if you have a few moments, please let me know how this post and/or the related posts are of interest for you. I do this work for myself, but I do very much welcome having some comments and feedback.
Thanks for reading.
.
Related
Hunt4Truth awake my soul, Einstein’s God, making the darkness conscious, You shall reap what you sow, Is the ego the source of our thoughts or …, and My friend Heather has a post that I want you to see
WordPress bloggers Lindsey Talbott: Carl Gustav Jung & The Red Book: 2013 Symposium Pt I, Becca Psyche Tarnas: The Red Book and the Red Book: Jung, Tolkien, and the Convergence of Images, Meaghan Duthie: Jung & Individuation – Creativity: Theory, Practice and History. (Week 4), Jungian Archetypes at Therapy Well Being, Heather Blackwell: You Repel Me, But It’s Attractive
BBC News BBC: Myths of the mind, BBC: Personality tests – Can they identify the real you
.
. . .
The Red Book:
When Carl Jung Lost and Found His Soul
.
The Making of The Red Book
.
beautiful images in that red book. Thanks for referring me to this post of yours, Eric. You are doing incredible work – as I’ve said before – and I find a lot of things of interest for me. A treasure
Pingback: Man cannot stand a meaningless life | the Hunt for Truth
see also:
The Gnostic Society Library
C.G Jung and The Red Book
Lectures presented by Lance S. Owens, MD
The World Within
Carl Gustav Jung & The Red Book
.
.
VIMEO video presentations:
.
Red Book Dialogues: Jack Kornfield & Katherine Sanford
.
Red Book Dialogues: Miranda July & John Beebe
.
Red Book Dialogues: Rabbi David Wolpe & Lionel Corbett
Youtube video presentations:
.
A Look Inside Carl Jung’s Red Book
.
Playlist: THE RED BOOK collection by Ana Presa
.
Playlist: Popular Carl Jung & Red Book videos
.
Library of Congress: Carl Gustav Jung & The Red Book (part 1)
Library of Congress: Carl Gustav Jung & The Red Book (part 2)
.
.
Related video:
.
Approaching The Unconscious
.
I’d just like to add that there’s nothing wrong being an introvert or extrovert. The world needs both. The diversity ensures that we all have some certain tasks to fulfill and some of us are better at one thing, and the others are more efficient at something different. The silent thoughtful person can discover distant worlds in the universe just as good as the well-spoken, brightly appearing, attention attracting extrovert. I believe too much analyzing oneself, unless you do this for scientific reasons, is not always a good thing. Categorizing personalities is fine as long as we do not try to squeeze some particular person in the narrow frames of dogmatic rules which dictate how one should be or what one should do. That’s why we are unique, every single one of us, even though there are thousands of people who fall in the same category, we still have something very individual which sets us apart from all other people in that category.
we are all part of the great mystical whole and each is as relevant and necessary as any other… excellent point. As I read Jung over the years, I gradually came to allow Holy Spirit in my life to bring me toward the divinity that ought be our highest realization of purpose. Jung provided his account of the struggle of going it the tougher way. I do appreciate his work. His personality archetypes work was used on a grand scale during World War II (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs_Type_Indicator)
Reblogged this on MadeleineMaya.
You can see the entire talk here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oy-x7BLlBYg
Yes, thanks… that program, “Carl Gustav Jung and the Red Book,” is part of an all day symposium, featuring presentations by prominent Jungian scholars.
That link is to part one. Here is a rundown on the participants:
Speaker Biography: Jung scholar Sonu Shamdasani is a London-based author, editor, and professor at the Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at University College London WIHM/UCL. Shamdasani works discuss the history of psychiatry and psychology from the mid-nineteenth century to current times. Shamdasani holds a BA from Bristol University, followed by MSc, History of Science and Medicine, University College London/Imperial College and gained his Ph.D. in History of Medicine from WIHM/UCL.
Speaker Biography: James Hillman is a psychologist, scholar, international lecturer, pioneer psychologist, and the author of more than twenty books. Hillman has held teaching positions at Yale University, the University of Chicago, Syracuse University, the University of Chicago, and the University of Dallas, where he cofounded the Dallas Institute of Humanities and Culture.
Speaker Biography: Ann Ulanov is a professor of psychiatry and religion at the Union Theological Seminary in New York City. She is the author of several books, including Religion and the Spiritual in Carl Jung and The Healing Imagination: The Meeting of Psyche and Soul.
.
.
transcript: http://www.loc.gov/today/cyberlc/transcripts/2010/100619mns0900.txt
.
.
.
.
There is also a
Part two: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAURpBfGA1I
Speaker Biography: Joseph Cambray is the Honorary Secretary of the International Association for Analytical Psychology and co-editor-in-chief of the Journal of Analytical Psychology.
Speaker Biography: Ernst Falzeder is a lecturer at the University of Innsbruck (Austria), psychotherapist, and a translator.
Speaker Biography: Dr. George Makari is a faculty member at the Center for Psychoanalytic Training and Research at Columbia University. Dr. Makari is a Professor of Psychiatry and Director of the Institute for the History of Psychiatry.
Speaker Biography: Betty Sue Flowers is the former director of the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum and an Emeritus Professor of English at the University of Texas at Austin.
Speaker Biography: John Beebe, M.D., is a Jungian analyst in practice in San Francisco. Beebe is a past President of the C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco, where he is currently on the teaching faculty, as well as Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at the University of California Medical School, San Francisco. Beebe is a Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association.
Speaker Biography: Thomas Kirsch, M.D. is the son of two first generation Jungian analysts, James and Hilde Kirsch, who began their analytic work with Jung in 1929. In addition to his private practice, Kirsch is on the faculty of the C.G. Jung Institute in San Francisco and a lecturer in the Department of Psychiatry at the Stanford Medical Center.
.
.
transcript: http://www.loc.gov/today/cyberlc/transcripts/2010/100619mns1300.txt
.
.
It is a lot of material. I did already watch/listen to both parts — admit to skipping some of it. Have you looked at the Red Book? I got a copy shortly after it came onto the market. I think it was something around $200 then – can’t recall though. Really, I didn’t need it as it turned out since so much is available for free with time on the Internet. I think Jung got sidetracked away from his intended work by his “guides” that led him away…
Thanks for adding the link.
I’m going to have to read this one in sections. How long did it take you to write it? Thank you for adding my article. Mine is a little light reading compared to yours : ) Good in depth info you have here.
It took me many editing session for the past month. I’d guess I spent at least twelve hours. Plus, even today, I found a couple of editing changes. Most of my posts are much easier to write. LOL… it was good for me though.
I know what you mean. I’ll go back and edit an article two months after I write.
I probably ought to have made this a series of posts. I feel still that I’ve left much unsaid in this post. I didn’t think it would require so much thought – it had seemed clear in my mind when I’d thought about writing this. I really can appreciate the difficulty of presenting complex information after this and a few previous science posts that I’ve tackled. Writing about such complex subjects is not my special talent really.